Though not by me.
No, this in depth analysis is provided courtesy of American Thinker’s Paul Shlichta. He’s very good.
I highly recommend you peruse American Thinker daily. The blog–with all its writers–is thoughtful, intelligent, and incisive.
A selection from the post:
“Flip-flop” is usually just a politician’s way of saying that an opponent has changed sides on an issue. But in fact, such a change can be good or bad. The primary index of infamy is not the degree or frequency of change but rather the motive for doing so. I therefore propose that we to define flip-flopping as “changing sides in a political issue for a dishonest or deceptive motive”.
Flip-flopping probably hit its peak during the 2004 campaign when Kerry was successfully pegged as king flip-flopper by the Bush campaign. It will be interesting to see the degree of prominence it attains in the coming, final months of the 2008 Presidential campaign.
If you have tips, questions, comments or suggestions, email me at firstname.lastname@example.org.