[ed. note: I don’t get the joke that Goldfarb asserts in the edit of his original post. But just because I don’t get it, doesn’t mean that it’s not funny.
No, that’s not true. If I don’t get it, it’s not funny. If anyone knows this character, tell him he’s an idiot and that this was a dumb joke.
Unless the joke was this: Watch as I lose all credibility. If so, ha ha.
I’m going to leave the original post so you can see what the fuss was all about.]
Petraeus will also be addressing the commissioning ceremonies for Harvard and MIT ROTC. THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned that General Petraeus is planning on delivering the commencement address at the University of Iowa in 2010. Hmmm.
At the risk of becoming Captain Obvious, Iowa is the start to every Presidential primary and thus, the campaign itself. A successful showing in Iowa gave Mike Huckabee a national audience.
Of course, it could be that there is simply nothing to see here–just another commencement address at another university by one of the most talented leaders of men (& women) in American history. The Spectator addresses that idea here.
Petraeus going to Iowa, a state he doesnâ€™t have previous ties to, is going to create a huge amount of buzz about his presidential ambitions because the Iowa Caucuses kick off the whole presidential nomination process. If he does, deliver the addressâ€”and Petraeus must know thisâ€”it will be seen as a sign that he is thinking about running in 2012.
Petraeus running against Obama would remind certain members of the military that many, ah, constituencies in the Democrat party do not like them. Remember Petraeus’s treatment by certain Democrat Senators & Rahm Emanuel in September 2007 (to say nothing of Moveon’s shameful ad)? Anyway, imagine how the revved up Democrat attack machine will treat Petraeus.
The question of a General running against the President who once commanded him is an interesting. The Spectator, again:
Previously, it has been thought that Petraeus would not run against a president who had been his Commander in Chief. But there are reports of tension between Petraeus and Obama over both Iraq and Afghan strategy.
So, General Petraeus thinks that whatever strategy Obama plans to pursue in some combination of Iraq/Afghanistan/(Iran?) is not a good one? What will the Obama apologists say about this?
Any combination of Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin + General David Petraeus would be dynamite leadership for this country–outclassing by far the administration in place now.
(via Ace, per usual)
If you have tips, questions, comments or suggestions, email me at firstname.lastname@example.org.